📅 Original date posted:2017-06-07 📝 Original message:Nick, > Please don't ...

Tao Effect [ARCHIVE] /

npub1r0g…dpg3

2023-06-07 18:02:24

in reply to nevent1q…5ruu

📅 Original date posted:2017-06-07
📝 Original message:Nick,

> Please don't spread misinformation. Whatever you think of the DAO hard fork, it's a simple fact that the Ethereum ledger was not edited.

This sort of email is unhelpful to this conversation, and it certainly doesn't help with the perception that Ethereum is nothing but a bunch of hypocritical Bankers 2.0.

Everyone knows you didn't edit Ethereum Classic, but the the hard fork, which was re-branded as Ethereum, was edited.

- Greg

--
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA.

> On Jun 7, 2017, at 6:25 AM, Nick Johnson <nick at ethereum.org <mailto:nick at ethereum.org>> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 12:02 AM Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org <mailto:bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Tao Effect via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org <mailto:bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
> > I believe the severity of replay attacks is going unvoiced and is not
> > understood within the bitcoin community because of their lack of experience
> > with them.
>
> Please don't insult our community-- the issues with replay were
> pointed out by us to Ethereum in advance and were cited specifically
> in prior hardfork discussions long before Ethereum started editing
> their ledger for the economic benefit of its centralized
> administrators.
>
> Please don't spread misinformation. Whatever you think of the DAO hard fork, it's a simple fact that the Ethereum ledger was not edited.
>
> -Nick Johnson

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170607/d0012334/attachment.html>;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170607/d0012334/attachment.sig>;

Author Public Key

npub1r0g954grld59fuphzsypmuuhpdunq67f729afmp44h2mxvth2hts4vdpg3

Show more details

Published at

2023-06-07 18:02:24

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "b25fa7c6fdfac464c69ed6fc2e361a90fe2f3e2602ead090423f384a4656e4b0", "pubkey": "1bd05a5503fb6854f03714081df3970b79306bc9f28bd4ec35add5b3317755d7", "created_at": 1686160944, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "e", "753128ff5203f7385f15743651b80e2131d69a7ed154ad15484c1ff10dea468c", "", "root" ], [ "e", "d8f51998c35c0ad40de4535abc7427e49c91f6d71607a34d17f970cb0dea95d6", "", "reply" ], [ "p", "da80d093286a7d3477060fc66c4023ab46aae35ea176395a2f2e3bddc8fd9bc2" ] ], "content": "📅 Original date posted:2017-06-07\n📝 Original message:Nick,\n\n\u003e Please don't spread misinformation. Whatever you think of the DAO hard fork, it's a simple fact that the Ethereum ledger was not edited.\n\nThis sort of email is unhelpful to this conversation, and it certainly doesn't help with the perception that Ethereum is nothing but a bunch of hypocritical Bankers 2.0.\n\nEveryone knows you didn't edit Ethereum Classic, but the the hard fork, which was re-branded as Ethereum, was edited.\n\n- Greg\n\n--\nPlease do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA.\n\n\u003e On Jun 7, 2017, at 6:25 AM, Nick Johnson \u003cnick at ethereum.org \u003cmailto:nick at ethereum.org\u003e\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \n\u003e On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 12:02 AM Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org \u003cmailto:bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e\u003e wrote:\n\u003e On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Tao Effect via bitcoin-dev\n\u003e \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org \u003cmailto:bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e I believe the severity of replay attacks is going unvoiced and is not\n\u003e \u003e understood within the bitcoin community because of their lack of experience\n\u003e \u003e with them.\n\u003e \n\u003e Please don't insult our community-- the issues with replay were\n\u003e pointed out by us to Ethereum in advance and were cited specifically\n\u003e in prior hardfork discussions long before Ethereum started editing\n\u003e their ledger for the economic benefit of its centralized\n\u003e administrators.\n\u003e \n\u003e Please don't spread misinformation. Whatever you think of the DAO hard fork, it's a simple fact that the Ethereum ledger was not edited.\n\u003e \n\u003e -Nick Johnson\n\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170607/d0012334/attachment.html\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 801 bytes\nDesc: Message signed with OpenPGP\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170607/d0012334/attachment.sig\u003e", "sig": "ca97aa572f76e22115170bd528d9a223f3a6551e2646f607e9ad38269d412e6c38cd2f08ddf26c45277db68c2998cb4e01fd335c5c21790d351599ff2d08a2f9" }