Luke Dashjr [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2016-12-14 📝 Original message:On Wednesday, December 14, ...
📅 Original date posted:2016-12-14
📝 Original message:On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 11:01:58 AM Johnson Lau via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> There is no reason to use a timestamp beyond 4 bytes.
Actually, there is: lock times... my overflow solution doesn't have a solution
to that. :x
Published at
2023-06-07 17:54:42Event JSON
{
"id": "b3720051b3c7ff30e547bd90c0b34e872b5cee444a87516f239e28c3f947e275",
"pubkey": "5a6d1f44482b67b5b0d30cc1e829b66a251f0dc99448377dbe3c5e0faf6c3803",
"created_at": 1686160482,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"e9090fa21a6c66dc37ff7a2b71914f8a3f269069994f08e729100d0adaa5c13f",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"04c309606d740137a3be453c0ccdec91ee0d02e3e1058e74ba49d7dbb564445d",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"492fa402e838904bdc8eb2c8fafa1aa895df26438bfd998c71b01cb9db550ff7"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-12-14\n📝 Original message:On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 11:01:58 AM Johnson Lau via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e There is no reason to use a timestamp beyond 4 bytes.\n\nActually, there is: lock times... my overflow solution doesn't have a solution \nto that. :x",
"sig": "6755536e925017a60ad3c141a7f137e1b0b405ea4aa8516439c8cf01c4f6d8b9cf2732f1b45dfd32af48139f068643fb4f63a640d398aa56377a55cc0854c8b7"
}