Privacy International on Nostr: The first was on 1 March, the UK’s data protection authority (ICO) found the policy ...
The first was on 1 March, the UK’s data protection authority (ICO) found the policy of GPS tagging asylum seekers arriving to the UK unlawful under data protection laws, and issued a formal warning to the Home Office for all future compliance of GPS tagging.
The second on 12 March, the Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) ruled in the case of Mark Nelson, a car mechanic and father of five, that his GPS tagging had been unlawful for over a year.
Published at
2024-05-17 13:08:47Event JSON
{
"id": "b712fbb348dbb1346c725f6330ca3e8dc69fa1a48a58591df4e08dad55c01c4f",
"pubkey": "135447d77acae9210941d81d405ef48b006d0b240baa2a1fcfc3b9a846b2675f",
"created_at": 1715951327,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"b0988621225f626d6622233cfc6effdf6adcd2067697014827d2f06e45e5ca45",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.xyz/users/privacyint/statuses/112456586174921222",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "The first was on 1 March, the UK’s data protection authority (ICO) found the policy of GPS tagging asylum seekers arriving to the UK unlawful under data protection laws, and issued a formal warning to the Home Office for all future compliance of GPS tagging.\n\nThe second on 12 March, the Upper Tribunal (Immigration \u0026 Asylum Chamber) ruled in the case of Mark Nelson, a car mechanic and father of five, that his GPS tagging had been unlawful for over a year.",
"sig": "138eba51db2119cfdb910e5e4eb243f456c2926cc8f2ee7ce8ab80fedf2fa40840f0b29668e5cd83fe35267d54bf37b6005f1acb5b99293f80e091f656bfcdaf"
}
