Pavol Rusnak [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2022-07-27 📝 Original message:On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at ...

📅 Original date posted:2022-07-27
📝 Original message:On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 00:28, Andrew Chow <achow101-lists at achow101.com>
wrote:

> However I don't see why this couldn't generalize to any sized tuples. As
> long as the tuples are all the same length, and the limit is one tuple per
> key expression, then we don't get any combinatorial blowup issues.
>

I think it's worthwhile to generalize for any sized tuples. I don't have
any existing particular use case in mind, because BIP-44, BIP-84, etc. are
fine with just using <0;1>, but there might be some upcoming standards in
the future that will want to introduce more sub-paths.


--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,

Pavol "stick" Rusnak
Co-Founder, SatoshiLabs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220727/d71a012a/attachment.html>;