Steve [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2011-09-06 🗒️ Summary of this message: The author ...
📅 Original date posted:2011-09-06
🗒️ Summary of this message: The author found a helpful article on the Dev & Tech forum regarding the getaddr message. They also shared some early results from running v0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.1.
📝 Original message:>
> While I'm asking questions I'll add one more regarding the getaddr
> message.
Talking to myself here. I just sent this message then found this
brilliant set of articles in the Dev & Tech forum which answers the
question very nicely: *https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=41722.0
<https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=6.0>
*
Anyway just as an FYI I've been running v0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.1 for about an
hour. It's only running 10 concurrent connections due to girlfriend
complaining she couldn't watch youtube but here's some early results.
New nodes: 19319 // node address discovered but no contact attempt made yet
Contacted nodes: 754
Uncontactable nodes: 3253
Limbo nodes: 9 //not as exciting as it sounds, just nodes with connect
in progress
Total nodes: 23335 // about 5000 from initial IRC discover, the rest are
from getaddr
Versions: {
300=1,
31900=7,
31902=1,
32000=2,
32001=7,
32002=22,
32100=100,
32200=24,
32300=277,
32400=317,
32500=2}
Fails: {
ConnectException: Connection refused=377,
IOException: Socket is disconnected=87,
SocketException: Network is unreachable=2,
ProtocolException: Error deserializing message =1,
NoRouteToHostException: No route to host=115,
SocketException: Connection reset=149,
SocketTimeoutException: connect timed out=2521}
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20110906/13d77ec5/attachment.html>
🗒️ Summary of this message: The author found a helpful article on the Dev & Tech forum regarding the getaddr message. They also shared some early results from running v0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.1.
📝 Original message:>
> While I'm asking questions I'll add one more regarding the getaddr
> message.
Talking to myself here. I just sent this message then found this
brilliant set of articles in the Dev & Tech forum which answers the
question very nicely: *https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=41722.0
<https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=6.0>
*
Anyway just as an FYI I've been running v0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.1 for about an
hour. It's only running 10 concurrent connections due to girlfriend
complaining she couldn't watch youtube but here's some early results.
New nodes: 19319 // node address discovered but no contact attempt made yet
Contacted nodes: 754
Uncontactable nodes: 3253
Limbo nodes: 9 //not as exciting as it sounds, just nodes with connect
in progress
Total nodes: 23335 // about 5000 from initial IRC discover, the rest are
from getaddr
Versions: {
300=1,
31900=7,
31902=1,
32000=2,
32001=7,
32002=22,
32100=100,
32200=24,
32300=277,
32400=317,
32500=2}
Fails: {
ConnectException: Connection refused=377,
IOException: Socket is disconnected=87,
SocketException: Network is unreachable=2,
ProtocolException: Error deserializing message =1,
NoRouteToHostException: No route to host=115,
SocketException: Connection reset=149,
SocketTimeoutException: connect timed out=2521}
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20110906/13d77ec5/attachment.html>