Daniel Lipshitz [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2022-12-13 š Original message:Thank you for bringing ...
š
Original date posted:2022-12-13
š Original message:Thank you for bringing that to my attention, apologies for not being aware
of it.
First-seen-safe replace-by-fee as detailed here
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-May/008248.html
by Peter Todd seems to be a very suitable option and route which balances
FullRBF while retaining the significant 0-conf use case.
This would seem like a good way forward.
________________________________
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 6:20 AM Yuval Kogman <nothingmuch at woobling.org>
wrote:
>
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-May/008248.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20221213/c757eb76/attachment-0001.html>
š Original message:Thank you for bringing that to my attention, apologies for not being aware
of it.
First-seen-safe replace-by-fee as detailed here
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-May/008248.html
by Peter Todd seems to be a very suitable option and route which balances
FullRBF while retaining the significant 0-conf use case.
This would seem like a good way forward.
________________________________
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 6:20 AM Yuval Kogman <nothingmuch at woobling.org>
wrote:
>
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-May/008248.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20221213/c757eb76/attachment-0001.html>