TheOneWithAReallyLongName on Nostr: It's true that no candidate advocating for sweeping change is going to get the ...

It's true that no candidate advocating for sweeping change is going to get the financial backing. But incremental change is better than nothing at all, and every single election, we get the chance to decide if we slide backwards a bit. Sometimes, the alternative is to hold steady, sometimes we get lucky and get a small bump in the right direction, sometimes we get real unlucky and we only get to decide how far back we slide. But every single time, the consequences matter, and over a lifetime, those small gains can add up to meaningful change.

Or you can give up, opt out, and let the rich have their way, which is to fuck you even harder. Your call, I guess.