Jean-Paul Kogelman [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2013-10-21 š Original message:I have some more ...
š
Original date posted:2013-10-21
š Original message:I have some more questions.
1) Should the protocol specification page also be codified into BIP(s)?
2) Should the current wiki pages be taken down / forwarded to the git repo or be auto updated from the git repo?
3) Even though the information in BIP 50 is valuable, should it really be considered a BIP?
On Oct 21, 2013, at 10:17 AM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at bitpay.com> wrote:
The goal is to improve the process, hash-seal our specs, and create an
easy way for anyone with at least an email address to participate.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131021/da1da444/attachment.html>;
š Original message:I have some more questions.
1) Should the protocol specification page also be codified into BIP(s)?
2) Should the current wiki pages be taken down / forwarded to the git repo or be auto updated from the git repo?
3) Even though the information in BIP 50 is valuable, should it really be considered a BIP?
On Oct 21, 2013, at 10:17 AM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at bitpay.com> wrote:
The goal is to improve the process, hash-seal our specs, and create an
easy way for anyone with at least an email address to participate.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131021/da1da444/attachment.html>;