📅 Original date posted:2015-09-03 📝 Original message:On Sep 3, 2015 5:58 PM, ...

Jorge Timón [ARCHIVE] /

npub1fx9…l2d8

2023-06-07 17:39:19

in reply to nevent1q…a0dx

📅 Original date posted:2015-09-03
📝 Original message:On Sep 3, 2015 5:58 PM, "Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at gmail.com> wrote:
> > A discussion of rolling out BIP 100 will not be avoided :)
> >
> > It is a hard fork; it would be silly to elide discussion of these key
> > issues.
> >
> > I don't get the community's recent interest in avoiding certain topics.
>
> It's not a matter of avoiding the subject, it's a whole separate
> discussion and in the interests of efficient discussion, it is best
> done separately. There's a whole BIP dedicated to the discussion of
> consensus forks which you should probably give some input in also,
> BIP99 [1]
>
> Once we come to an agreement and can say "here's what we're doing
> about blocksize, it will be X, or we'll raise by this algo", then we
> can discuss the best way to implement the hard fork.
>
> [1] https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/181

In fact, that discussion can happen in parallel. But it is more efficient
to do so in one place instead of in each of the 5+ hardfork proposals
(bip99 itself has a hardfork proposal with its code ready).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150903/a11ae3c3/attachment.html>;

Author Public Key

npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8

Show more details

Published at

2023-06-07 17:39:19

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "b5d04e67c03a1bd2409844e89520f8f525a3e23471e17c141f36646ecfaa6840", "pubkey": "498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84", "created_at": 1686159559, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "e", "a137c877ff26a7c79ddcf309fc77d8729c3f5cc9c177f8e08369ded48fb80356", "", "root" ], [ "e", "b1d220d1027df39b890f158ae24f3e69ce30dd39b962cc90c98e047d4888b3ec", "", "reply" ], [ "p", "fdf31024ca0537ed828d895ddc8525f8af023f0dc935a8327a8a496d0d7a9f83" ] ], "content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-09-03\n📝 Original message:On Sep 3, 2015 5:58 PM, \"Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev\" \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Jeff Garzik \u003cjgarzik at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e A discussion of rolling out BIP 100 will not be avoided :)\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e It is a hard fork; it would be silly to elide discussion of these key\n\u003e \u003e issues.\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e I don't get the community's recent interest in avoiding certain topics.\n\u003e\n\u003e It's not a matter of avoiding the subject, it's a whole separate\n\u003e discussion and in the interests of efficient discussion, it is best\n\u003e done separately. There's a whole BIP dedicated to the discussion of\n\u003e consensus forks which you should probably give some input in also,\n\u003e BIP99 [1]\n\u003e\n\u003e Once we come to an agreement and can say \"here's what we're doing\n\u003e about blocksize, it will be X, or we'll raise by this algo\", then we\n\u003e can discuss the best way to implement the hard fork.\n\u003e\n\u003e [1] https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/181\n\nIn fact, that discussion can happen in parallel. But it is more efficient\nto do so in one place instead of in each of the 5+ hardfork proposals\n(bip99 itself has a hardfork proposal with its code ready).\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150903/a11ae3c3/attachment.html\u003e", "sig": "a7755930c01cd4adb4152b324e3267eb010d4334d5db4b847bae7cde876c38fdb08bc1bbd32fa6cc68929b9393ddacca7a3f8349aaf847cd07dd35a86d32aa02" }