Stephen Royle on Nostr: I notice in the peer review file, a reviewer asks why they don't cite the Rubinstein ...
I notice in the peer review file, a reviewer asks why they don't cite the Rubinstein preprint. They say that it was posted after they submitted their ms, although Nature lists the submitted date as 9th April and the Rubinstein preprint went up on 1st.
Whatever they omitted it, they cite it (and another related preprint from Kudryashev lab which was posted after the submission) in the final version.
Published at
2024-06-06 09:37:06Event JSON
{
"id": "b1f16799cb283b116ab71b63c222bd53f9a3d5c57ccdb7c27683fcdea65ba009",
"pubkey": "32af77123f496f6bc3a78acbc8965fd1910485a660a9296a159b40e95282a7db",
"created_at": 1717666626,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"0de4cf71d3347a096adabbedf7b1bcdf531a583621018bcd43d69b21c17825e4",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://biologists.social/users/steveroyle/statuses/112569000002404427",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "I notice in the peer review file, a reviewer asks why they don't cite the Rubinstein preprint. They say that it was posted after they submitted their ms, although Nature lists the submitted date as 9th April and the Rubinstein preprint went up on 1st.\nWhatever they omitted it, they cite it (and another related preprint from Kudryashev lab which was posted after the submission) in the final version.",
"sig": "b9ec178e53aa357615c4d56678e93dc032d53a7fce2369c24232b4afddd8e798fb4fa4a158e3d15bb3a043d12212137fe76f9d86288011aa317a0ad725440d31"
}
