Event JSON
{
"id": "b1db69650a7e63eb5a8872557d9194881eef42da8dc63cb148334c7cc7ea2d49",
"pubkey": "8aaa1670f0c7e5e081c9ccd587a94d5e8f8cdfffa5fdba84cec413979a14afa2",
"created_at": 1690400828,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"00f55ead2b78d35bb2c960e2ccf213177d2ed3dee34d6d2c041b379f9b9e1da0",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"2e6a76933792e4296894d019b7ac405e6f0d951fc79629ac992e1bb232273129",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"7d304b9de767fb524a390c3911e3ba712171855f98a6e8209c936dfac5ab0ecb",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"content-warning",
"Imperium"
],
[
"mostr",
"https://mastodon.nu/users/Loukas/statuses/110782108728894485"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1qr64atft0rf4hvkfvr3veusnza7ja577udxk6tqyrvmelxu7rksqjw4k8p no, there's not a single concept and political scientists and historians argue about it :) one old definition is a ruler who has no other ruler over them. You can be a king of kings but not a king of emperors. The ancient Roman 'imperator' just meant a military commander so our modern term is born of a mish mash.",
"sig": "a9328abb42e1be9de2c103a70d40c3d6311b125200db60f9eafcc651f6917c3ae000a666a9dc9cf055b2df508b07b03f416cfaff86d630a250164335aefd011e"
}
