Neo Sovereign on Nostr: I have a question I haven't been able to find a clear answer to. Most of the guides ...

I have a question I haven't been able to find a clear answer to. Most of the guides I've seen about obtaining Anon Sats recommended (strongly) running them through a coinjoin. This makes sense, as it reinforces what could be poor fungibility based on the sender's history. I've also seen (strong) recommendations for executing the same process when moving off exchange. Given the premium involved in the former (particularly regarding ATMs), isn't the latter nothing more than a more efficient (cost-wise) method of obtaining the same outcome? It seems that CoinJoins are really the linchpin in maintaining fungibility rather than the source of the acquisition. Please let me know if I'm misinterpreting or overlooking some aspect of the process.

Would really love to hear some opinions of the most respected voices I know of on this.

GrassFedBitcoin (npub1wnl…n3wr) ODELL (npub1qny…95gx) NVK (npub1az9…m8y8) walker (npub1cj8…rz4u) SeedSigner (npub17ty…3mgl) Parman - Activate OP_GFY now!! (npub1ltt…k97y)