C Ⓐ T on Nostr: npub1pdy5m…ujm0h Circular reasoning is invalid because it doesn't provide any new ...
npub1pdy5mq69gpmc0apt0ydy5mfl0h2352h527v2293kgdw0sm42uhjq9ujm0h (npub1pdy…jm0h)
Circular reasoning is invalid because it doesn't provide any new information or evidence to support a claim. Instead, it simply restates the claim in different words. This creates a logical fallacy because it assumes the conclusion to be true without offering independent justification. In essence, it's like saying "A is true because A is true," which doesn't provide any valid reasoning or evidence. Therefore, circular reasoning fails to establish the validity of an argument.
Circular reasoning is invalid because it doesn't provide any new information or evidence to support a claim. Instead, it simply restates the claim in different words. This creates a logical fallacy because it assumes the conclusion to be true without offering independent justification. In essence, it's like saying "A is true because A is true," which doesn't provide any valid reasoning or evidence. Therefore, circular reasoning fails to establish the validity of an argument.