Free Idealist on Nostr: Not all forms of Western dominance are a negative, and not all forms of Eastern ...
Not all forms of Western dominance are a negative, and not all forms of Eastern influence are good for us. Western Whites need to remember that taking control of our societies from our oppressors means inheriting most of the influence they've set up. I bring this up because I've seen a lot of our guys cheering for these anti-French movements in west Africa, and I think that's not the pro-White attitude to have. Sure, France is far from being the kind of country we would like, but they're a good deal closer to obtaining that dream than other nations are. The French people are prone to anti-government action, and the more racial tensions flare up the more even the French far-left adopt a racist attitude. The future will be more racially defined than ideologically defined, and I think France will be a major flashpoint for this change.
So who do we want to have influence in Africa? Eastern powers that will either arm more African states or pull their resources eastward, ultimately arming Asiatic forces? Or would we prefer it in the hands of the French, who will inevitably return to a state that we can support? I know what I'd prefer, and I think it's telling that the US doesn't seem to want their NATO "ally" to maintain influence in the region.
So who do we want to have influence in Africa? Eastern powers that will either arm more African states or pull their resources eastward, ultimately arming Asiatic forces? Or would we prefer it in the hands of the French, who will inevitably return to a state that we can support? I know what I'd prefer, and I think it's telling that the US doesn't seem to want their NATO "ally" to maintain influence in the region.