📅 Original date posted:2021-04-26 📝 Original message:ACK for Kalle. On Mon, Apr ...

James O'Beirne [ARCHIVE] /

npub1dpd…mz3t

2023-06-07 22:52:08

in reply to nevent1q…jj9p

📅 Original date posted:2021-04-26
📝 Original message:ACK for Kalle.

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021, 09:55 Sjors Provoost via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> ACK for adding Kalle.
>
> Recent drama aside, having a single editor is not ideal. There's currently
> 110 open pull requests to the BIPs repo.
>
> - Sjors
>
> > Op 23 apr. 2021, om 04:09 heeft Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> het volgende geschreven:
> >
> > Unless there are objections, I intend to add Kalle Alm as a BIP editor to
> > assist in merging PRs into the bips git repo.
> >
> > Since there is no explicit process to adding BIP editors, IMO it should
> be
> > fine to use BIP 2's Process BIP progression:
> >
> >> A process BIP may change status from Draft to Active when it achieves
> >> rough consensus on the mailing list. Such a proposal is said to have
> >> rough consensus if it has been open to discussion on the development
> >> mailing list for at least one month, and no person maintains any
> >> unaddressed substantiated objections to it.
> >
> > A Process BIP could be opened for each new editor, but IMO that is
> > unnecessary. If anyone feels there is a need for a new Process BIP, we
> can go
> > that route, but there is prior precedent for BIP editors appointing new
> BIP
> > editors, so I think this should be fine.
> >
> > Please speak up soon if you disagree.
> >
> > Luke
> > _______________________________________________
> > bitcoin-dev mailing list
> > bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20210426/34c723c3/attachment.html>;

Author Public Key

npub1dpdfw74plzm03mzglkdegp3hqn6qs9yffqefa5kh98mru49nrg7szymz3t

Show more details

Published at

2023-06-07 22:52:08

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "b0a446e8a9cc8ad357568df6cfffbae77037089b2eea2c26b601bde72fb813f6", "pubkey": "685a977aa1f8b6f8ec48fd9b94063704f408148948329ed2d729f63e54b31a3d", "created_at": 1686178328, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "e", "52d21b3bdb5623e9c3469870d0da89b418ab6e28a17db8c410ab4681c4e6f9ba", "", "root" ], [ "e", "25845329fcf2c45e3243ea846c2101da06a270ec200174c6755f14e83131715a", "", "reply" ], [ "p", "e1ad0d0d83103f222425541294008149d215c1e1629b0bb37b98e19f698feb3e" ] ], "content": "📅 Original date posted:2021-04-26\n📝 Original message:ACK for Kalle.\n\nOn Mon, Apr 26, 2021, 09:55 Sjors Provoost via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e ACK for adding Kalle.\n\u003e\n\u003e Recent drama aside, having a single editor is not ideal. There's currently\n\u003e 110 open pull requests to the BIPs repo.\n\u003e\n\u003e - Sjors\n\u003e\n\u003e \u003e Op 23 apr. 2021, om 04:09 heeft Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev \u003c\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e het volgende geschreven:\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e Unless there are objections, I intend to add Kalle Alm as a BIP editor to\n\u003e \u003e assist in merging PRs into the bips git repo.\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e Since there is no explicit process to adding BIP editors, IMO it should\n\u003e be\n\u003e \u003e fine to use BIP 2's Process BIP progression:\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e\u003e A process BIP may change status from Draft to Active when it achieves\n\u003e \u003e\u003e rough consensus on the mailing list. Such a proposal is said to have\n\u003e \u003e\u003e rough consensus if it has been open to discussion on the development\n\u003e \u003e\u003e mailing list for at least one month, and no person maintains any\n\u003e \u003e\u003e unaddressed substantiated objections to it.\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e A Process BIP could be opened for each new editor, but IMO that is\n\u003e \u003e unnecessary. If anyone feels there is a need for a new Process BIP, we\n\u003e can go\n\u003e \u003e that route, but there is prior precedent for BIP editors appointing new\n\u003e BIP\n\u003e \u003e editors, so I think this should be fine.\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e Please speak up soon if you disagree.\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e Luke\n\u003e \u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e \u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e \u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e \u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20210426/34c723c3/attachment.html\u003e", "sig": "27aad806abf5b135233474c924863ef338707803514e4d3675354c618f771140a54b4048a289180e866352ae26643efedeab54f6fbfadda77484916aee81b4d8" }