Michael Busch on Nostr: Still true. And automated plagiarism by text generator is still not research. No ...
Still true.
And automated plagiarism by text generator is still not research.
No scientists should pretend otherwise.
QT Michael Busch [@michael_w_busch](https://mastodon.online/@michael_w_busch )
2023 October 16
No, automated plagiarism by text generator is not "changing the definition of a scientific paper".
And it is appalling that scientific journals like @Nature would publish pieces suggesting it is.
And automated plagiarism by text generator is still not research.
No scientists should pretend otherwise.
QT Michael Busch [@michael_w_busch](https://mastodon.online/@michael_w_busch )
2023 October 16
No, automated plagiarism by text generator is not "changing the definition of a scientific paper".
And it is appalling that scientific journals like @Nature would publish pieces suggesting it is.