LogicallyMinded on Nostr: I don’t have a definitive opinion on what took place with the #TrumpAssassination ...
I don’t have a definitive opinion on what took place with the #TrumpAssassination attempt but it is very unlikely that this event was allowed to happen because of a negligence of the secret service.
What are the chance that the secret service would have failed to secure the building on which the the shooter was posted? Plus, how can we explain that the counter sniper let the terrorist fired first when he had him in visual minutes before the shooting started? These two facts most likely indicate an intent within the chain of command to let it happened.
Now the question that remains is whether or not the intent was to conduct the assassination of #Trump or to fake an assassination attempt on Trump.
While it seems egregious to entertain the latter, I don’t think we should definitely exclude it yet. Although, I haven’t seen any evidence supporting the « fake assassination » scenario, it wouldn’t be the most complicated #FalseFlag to execute especially when compared to other much larger false flag operations that took place.
The element that would really make me reconsider the possibility of this scenario is if it turned out that a bullet certainly pierced Trump’s ear. Until, we have more information on this element it’s not to be excluded that the terrorist shot at the crowd without actually directly aiming at Trump.
In the scenario where it was a real assassination attempt, the #DeepState totally failed its operation and made their enemy (Trump) stronger.
In the scenario where it was a fake assassination attempt, the execution by the deep state was flawless and Trump’s posture as the enemy of the deeps state is being reinforced (although he’s a deep state asset). There are also many other ways this operation would benefit the deep state. One of which would be to unite the American population behind a strong leader in preparation of a #WW3.
What are the chance that the secret service would have failed to secure the building on which the the shooter was posted? Plus, how can we explain that the counter sniper let the terrorist fired first when he had him in visual minutes before the shooting started? These two facts most likely indicate an intent within the chain of command to let it happened.
Now the question that remains is whether or not the intent was to conduct the assassination of #Trump or to fake an assassination attempt on Trump.
While it seems egregious to entertain the latter, I don’t think we should definitely exclude it yet. Although, I haven’t seen any evidence supporting the « fake assassination » scenario, it wouldn’t be the most complicated #FalseFlag to execute especially when compared to other much larger false flag operations that took place.
The element that would really make me reconsider the possibility of this scenario is if it turned out that a bullet certainly pierced Trump’s ear. Until, we have more information on this element it’s not to be excluded that the terrorist shot at the crowd without actually directly aiming at Trump.
In the scenario where it was a real assassination attempt, the #DeepState totally failed its operation and made their enemy (Trump) stronger.
In the scenario where it was a fake assassination attempt, the execution by the deep state was flawless and Trump’s posture as the enemy of the deeps state is being reinforced (although he’s a deep state asset). There are also many other ways this operation would benefit the deep state. One of which would be to unite the American population behind a strong leader in preparation of a #WW3.