Adële on Nostr: In conclusion of discussions here, XHTML basic 1.0 seems to be a very good candidate ...

In conclusion of discussions here, XHTML basic 1.0 seems to be a very good candidate to certify websites as members of #smolweb

https://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xhtml-basic-20001219/

- a subset of XHTML for various screen size with low capabilities
- optional css
- xml format (easy to parse)
- no useless tags
- no script
- no inline style

Are there any volunteers to create an informal group to promote a #smolweb
based on compatibility with a simple HTML format (certainly based on xhtml basic 1.0).

RT is welcome 🔄