Gregory Maxwell [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: đź“… Original date posted:2014-04-23 đź“ť Original message:On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at ...
đź“… Original date posted:2014-04-23
đź“ť Original message:On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Warren Togami Jr. <wtogami at gmail.com> wrote:
> If you are
> a rare user who needs Bitcoin-Qt on an incompatible system you can at least
> build it from source.
Tails users usually can't really build it from source— talks is a live
boot mostly stateless linux distribution for privacy applications.
It's really good in general.
I agree that we shouldn't be statically linking QT on linux generally
(due to things like theming), though maybe we could just have the
build process dump out a seperate extra static QT binary just for
these other cases? I feel like the work maintaining it would be less
than what we've had in answering questions/complaints about it.
đź“ť Original message:On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Warren Togami Jr. <wtogami at gmail.com> wrote:
> If you are
> a rare user who needs Bitcoin-Qt on an incompatible system you can at least
> build it from source.
Tails users usually can't really build it from source— talks is a live
boot mostly stateless linux distribution for privacy applications.
It's really good in general.
I agree that we shouldn't be statically linking QT on linux generally
(due to things like theming), though maybe we could just have the
build process dump out a seperate extra static QT binary just for
these other cases? I feel like the work maintaining it would be less
than what we've had in answering questions/complaints about it.