Rusty Russell [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2018-11-13 📝 Original message: ZmnSCPxj via ...
📅 Original date posted:2018-11-13
📝 Original message:
ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev <lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> writes:
> Thus, I propose:
>
> * The local feature bit `option_i_wumbo_you_wumbo`, which indicates that the node is willing to wumbo with its counterparty in the connection.
> * The global feature bit `option_anyone_can_wumbo`, which indicates that the node is willing to wumbo with any node.
I think we need to name `option_anyone_can_wumbo` to `option_wumborama`?
Otherwise, this looks excellent.
Thanks,
Rusty.
📝 Original message:
ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev <lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> writes:
> Thus, I propose:
>
> * The local feature bit `option_i_wumbo_you_wumbo`, which indicates that the node is willing to wumbo with its counterparty in the connection.
> * The global feature bit `option_anyone_can_wumbo`, which indicates that the node is willing to wumbo with any node.
I think we need to name `option_anyone_can_wumbo` to `option_wumborama`?
Otherwise, this looks excellent.
Thanks,
Rusty.