Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-06-19 📝 Original message:On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at ...

📅 Original date posted:2015-06-19
📝 Original message:On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:44:08AM -0400, Peter Todd wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:33:05AM -0400, Stephen Morse wrote:
> > It is disappointing that F2Pool would enable full RBF when the safe
> > alternative, first-seen-safe RBF, is also available, especially since the
> > fees they would gain by supporting full RBF over FSS RBF would likely be
> > negligible. Did they consider using FSS RBF instead?
>
> Specifically the following is what I told them:

Incidentally, because someone asked that message was sent two weeks ago.


Also, a shout-out to Marshal Long of FinalHash for his help with
(FSS)-RBF deployment and for getting F2Pool and myself in touch, as well
as his work in talking getting pools on board with BIP66.

--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000000bb4abd88c6b023e9f19a1c1deaac120467279c330a803cf
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 650 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150619/8f8feff6/attachment.sig>;