SimplifiedPrivacy.com on Nostr: What if I gave you the perfect reply to your haters? Under a Pessimism Attack, a ...
What if I gave you the perfect reply to your haters?
Under a Pessimism Attack, a random peasant with no position of authority, seeks to speak for all of humanity. The goal is to "black-pill" the speaker (who is creating value), by making broad and general negative statements, about what all of society thinks.
The hater has failed to create value or any meaning on their own, so they strive to achieve rank in social situations, by hazing others. However, this pessimism is logically flawed.
First, the value creator is usually trying to promote new technology. But the hater often has to use new technology itself to spew the dribble. So only because computers, networking, decentralized or traditional social networks, and software have been created by others, can the pure pessimist even communicate pessimism about new technology.
If the hater is admitting to using trendy tech, only after it has gained mass adoption, then they admit that they are not a thought-leader, and therefore unqualified to speak for all of humanity.
Second, the hater fails to acknowledge that the oppressor's only power is pessimism. For example banks leeching through government money, or Big Tech censoring through traditional social networks. If the technology already exists to shake the predator class, (for example cryptocurrency or decentralized social networks), than it's only psychology and cultural awareness that gives these corrupt institutions power.
By engaging in blind and purposeless pessimism, the hater aids the oppressor in solidifying their power... but the hater doesn't even benefit personally.
So the hater is for free, and for no purpose or personal benefit, acting as cheerleader for the predator class, to haze alternative technology... So they can continue to NOT get funds or freedom.
Under a Pessimism Attack, a random peasant with no position of authority, seeks to speak for all of humanity. The goal is to "black-pill" the speaker (who is creating value), by making broad and general negative statements, about what all of society thinks.
The hater has failed to create value or any meaning on their own, so they strive to achieve rank in social situations, by hazing others. However, this pessimism is logically flawed.
First, the value creator is usually trying to promote new technology. But the hater often has to use new technology itself to spew the dribble. So only because computers, networking, decentralized or traditional social networks, and software have been created by others, can the pure pessimist even communicate pessimism about new technology.
If the hater is admitting to using trendy tech, only after it has gained mass adoption, then they admit that they are not a thought-leader, and therefore unqualified to speak for all of humanity.
Second, the hater fails to acknowledge that the oppressor's only power is pessimism. For example banks leeching through government money, or Big Tech censoring through traditional social networks. If the technology already exists to shake the predator class, (for example cryptocurrency or decentralized social networks), than it's only psychology and cultural awareness that gives these corrupt institutions power.
By engaging in blind and purposeless pessimism, the hater aids the oppressor in solidifying their power... but the hater doesn't even benefit personally.
So the hater is for free, and for no purpose or personal benefit, acting as cheerleader for the predator class, to haze alternative technology... So they can continue to NOT get funds or freedom.