PeterK on Nostr: Sure, but that wasn't the question. The question was "why does the Canadian version ...
Sure, but that wasn't the question. The question was "why does the Canadian version have less artificial ingredients than the American version?"
But they can't just leave it at that. They have to use a rhetorical trick to make you think the question was different, then prove that the question that wasn't asked was leading you to a false conclusion.
This was the NY Times "Fact Checking" RFK Jr., in case you care.
Published at
2024-11-17 15:50:56Event JSON
{
"id": "b92b3a54eaab14f49ede68c20a129ffae38e3fc74b01bd282051267438d9d237",
"pubkey": "f962906847bbc3de198e685342f117206ec09d7115adf10c947f23a681b3fbb4",
"created_at": 1731858656,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"352c7c519b9ddefc3bd5ec37bdf86a9dc020d3edb14b86c7fc65064a82ab9048",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"9da7a1842d59ba72843e66104662fb81ab5e4981e5bb30a3ee8558d3b35de863",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f962906847bbc3de198e685342f117206ec09d7115adf10c947f23a681b3fbb4"
],
[
"p",
"190b17c8db1b5626012d183c7ae89b1630fbddfffe8eb5b248f5ac30ae1d785b"
]
],
"content": "Sure, but that wasn't the question. The question was \"why does the Canadian version have less artificial ingredients than the American version?\" \n\nBut they can't just leave it at that. They have to use a rhetorical trick to make you think the question was different, then prove that the question that wasn't asked was leading you to a false conclusion.\n\nThis was the NY Times \"Fact Checking\" RFK Jr., in case you care.",
"sig": "06f9a7cf4196d5f516da98bdb7fc9eef7aaa93800a503ce6c4df467881a3720d543e2bd97173ee758cc38515ca43bb705953565a06725a6e23e1c83ddfff6c88"
}
