Zach on Nostr: 1. Calling everything inscribed “ugly” is subjective and irrelevant as to whether ...
1. Calling everything inscribed “ugly” is subjective and irrelevant as to whether or not they are scammers
2. You can say that they are spam, but the intention of the inscribers is to attach provenance to their art. You may think that is dumb, but at least understand their intent.
3. You are the one calling them scammers so the burden of proof is on you. I agree that anyone making bs promises about “utility” or shitcoins going up in value are acting maliciously and can be considered a scammer. But if someone is just selling a jpeg to a willing buyer I see absolutely nothing wrong with that. Who are you or I to tell someone what they can or cannot purchase? Bitcoin is freedom money, and it’s nobody business outside of those who are part of the transaction. Sure it may be pure speculation, but who gives a fuck, let them speculate, it’s a free country. Pura vida 🤙
(I really just hate seeing people shitting on each other when we should be all on the same team 🥹)
2. You can say that they are spam, but the intention of the inscribers is to attach provenance to their art. You may think that is dumb, but at least understand their intent.
3. You are the one calling them scammers so the burden of proof is on you. I agree that anyone making bs promises about “utility” or shitcoins going up in value are acting maliciously and can be considered a scammer. But if someone is just selling a jpeg to a willing buyer I see absolutely nothing wrong with that. Who are you or I to tell someone what they can or cannot purchase? Bitcoin is freedom money, and it’s nobody business outside of those who are part of the transaction. Sure it may be pure speculation, but who gives a fuck, let them speculate, it’s a free country. Pura vida 🤙
(I really just hate seeing people shitting on each other when we should be all on the same team 🥹)