Btc Drak [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: π Original date posted:2015-10-05 π Original message:On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at ...
π
Original date posted:2015-10-05
π Original message:On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Peter R via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> I also agree with Mike that Core's requirement for unanimous consensus
> results in development grid lock and should be revisited.
>
There is no development gridlock. Look at the IRC logs for core-dev; look
at the pull requests; look a the merge history: Development is vibrant.
Developers are very active. You are manufacturing a crisis convenient to
your narrative, but it is far from the actual reality on the ground.
Please desist from this intellectual dishonesty and toxicity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151005/4d591b1b/attachment.html>
π Original message:On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Peter R via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> I also agree with Mike that Core's requirement for unanimous consensus
> results in development grid lock and should be revisited.
>
There is no development gridlock. Look at the IRC logs for core-dev; look
at the pull requests; look a the merge history: Development is vibrant.
Developers are very active. You are manufacturing a crisis convenient to
your narrative, but it is far from the actual reality on the ground.
Please desist from this intellectual dishonesty and toxicity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151005/4d591b1b/attachment.html>