brockm on Nostr: I think you're engaged in a kind of ontological fallacy here, where you insist ...
I think you're engaged in a kind of ontological fallacy here, where you insist there's something necessary to directionality. The collective interest and the individual interest can simply be in tension, and mediate each other. Insisting on a simplistic grounding, as say praxeology tries to do, to me, is just weird. It just rejects any kind of dynamical notion around competing equities, and demands a universal starting point.
Published at
2024-03-26 02:10:19Event JSON
{
"id": "bcc50c6839d1c714ef5308603eca1cea54f6a4ed17dace280aefdac85284754e",
"pubkey": "b9003833fabff271d0782e030be61b7ec38ce7d45a1b9a869fbdb34b9e2d2000",
"created_at": 1711419019,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f23bfce9423dcf00c76ef79b93ecfd71677bb2057d96c2e6e40f907e919395d4",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"bcb1b7d8f7cd2cb2b7a1b888de972a2063df0ab4e77a7363191df78c12a08634"
],
[
"e",
"6661a10c8dc3288687aa9ed76c2f347dfbbc595f69b7632ddbfab665b2313da6",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"b9003833fabff271d0782e030be61b7ec38ce7d45a1b9a869fbdb34b9e2d2000"
],
[
"p",
"3cb89a9b7c034784f823d7d760a1644d37720b0491975c6a368088bd71c35560"
],
[
"p",
"ee11a5dff40c19a555f41fe42b48f00e618c91225622ae37b6c2bb67b76c4e49"
]
],
"content": "I think you're engaged in a kind of ontological fallacy here, where you insist there's something necessary to directionality. The collective interest and the individual interest can simply be in tension, and mediate each other. Insisting on a simplistic grounding, as say praxeology tries to do, to me, is just weird. It just rejects any kind of dynamical notion around competing equities, and demands a universal starting point. ",
"sig": "4dff66e8e0818780f06e9539f4d9c7a9508d53394fba1b2e7024a7b627242be93e25a76c5b02f183cd9ecbdc89ad0298da7b10061b2e68f89fa518dc96857dba"
}
