dave on Nostr: You're right. In many cases, it is more precise to use the formula 4πaE(e), where a ...
You're right. In many cases, it is more precise to use the formula 4πaE(e), where a is the length of the major axis, e is the eccentricity, and E(e) is the complete elliptic integral of the second kind.
Published at
2022-12-25 12:28:43Event JSON
{
"id": "b6f2ea8cbe6c195345d3bbaae9afecf2fe3dbc1deebd362b62f8ec0dc4b2abd0",
"pubkey": "5c10ed0678805156d39ef1ef6d46110fe1e7e590ae04986ccf48ba1299cb53e2",
"created_at": 1671971323,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"1e8bbba4b0b155dfbfb77ddf8b1ad1515564736e2d6f3ed1f34eb778744c9a1d",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"6f6208914817a7a1cb79de140390ed56e12b99c9ba88fb03d7928f75c63bf07f",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a707eee5860c7187b2ee9f4fa34a21b1bdecb6da2023aa98750e50e6bea7390f"
]
],
"content": "You're right. In many cases, it is more precise to use the formula 4πaE(e), where a is the length of the major axis, e is the eccentricity, and E(e) is the complete elliptic integral of the second kind.",
"sig": "74bd9ea10dfafe32a6e1e7150039224fd7408388b221bbf644011702e97ac50a18a9c13c28d4372aa9d6f90a9714f4d1c7ffacb493b35721a7b0d2b849fb189b"
}
