Allen Piscitello [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-03-27 📝 Original message:Don't most of these coins ...

📅 Original date posted:2014-03-27
📝 Original message:Don't most of these coins have a magic number already assigned that is
unique? (0xD9B4BEF9 for Bitcoin, 0x0709110B for Testnet, FBC0XB6DB for
Litecoin, etc...). This seems like a good candidate for identifying coins,
and also supports Testnet cases well. Maybe there are some alts without
such a magic number that might prevent that?

-Allen


On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at bitpay.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Tamas Blummer <tamas at bitsofproof.com>
> wrote:
> > A notable suggestion was to instead of building a directory of magic
> numbers
> > (like 0 for Bitcoin, 1 for Litecoin etc) use a hash of the word
> "Bitcoin",
> > "Litecoin", "Dogecoin", so collosion is unlikely and
> > cetral directory is not needed.
>
> +1 good idea
>
> --
> Jeff Garzik
> Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
> BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140327/acb6e25e/attachment.html>;