Seth Michael Larson on Nostr: npub172v3n…u689n I had the thought that this might be useful as dataclasses.record ...

npub172v3nlrtzd8wssn8f3ckm47jtsxdhq0jakqua3crgrvn7mmv32vsju689n (npub172v…689n) I had the thought that this might be useful as dataclasses.record (and I see there was some agreement in Discuss too). I really like the concept though!

One concern I had was regarding "isinstance()" checks, it could be confusing that there is no mention of class yet this bound name behaves like a type?