casey is remote on Nostr: nprofile1q…cdkwa nprofile1q…e9wrc I'm on board with 2, 4, and 5 On point 1, there ...
nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqfzl62au2n3z78famxg433zkxkms9ald5qew9fzvsk5gcfzus5vzq5cdkwa (nprofile…dkwa) nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqlse4pfx8qmlw529cl8xq4xdz2n80yjla3a6k5yvvva78udm05uvsce9wrc (nprofile…9wrc) I'm on board with 2, 4, and 5
On point 1, there HAS to be a safeguard against unconstitutional actions. #SCOTUS is flawed, but I'd argue the best system we have to guard against that.
On point 6, you might end up seeing multiple pieces of legislation stitched together to work around this, so I don't think it'd be effectually binding.
/1
On point 1, there HAS to be a safeguard against unconstitutional actions. #SCOTUS is flawed, but I'd argue the best system we have to guard against that.
On point 6, you might end up seeing multiple pieces of legislation stitched together to work around this, so I don't think it'd be effectually binding.
/1