Chris Hamm on Nostr: npub1cm5z3…vc0wz Judge Winsor writes “the secondary problem is that the laws’ ...
npub1cm5z3wks3766nwc09yh6kag2qkxp5r373tugfhcpunq026hf80wqfvc0wz (npub1cm5…c0wz) Judge Winsor writes “the secondary problem is that the laws’ effects are not limited to Disney. The laws are directed at a special development district in which Disney operates. But as Disney acknowledges, it is not the district’s only landowner, and other landowners within the district are affected by the same laws.”
Is there a minimum number of entities affected by the laws in question required for retaliatory intent to be ignored?
Published at
2024-02-01 02:18:02Event JSON
{
"id": "b2d494947192d078841c7ed4e853d41ba67500cd8ee0496247078f05fbb62e1d",
"pubkey": "a21bc08fefcc0ed6fbabdba288672bd288b1da2867e236461a3b581ffee01623",
"created_at": 1706753882,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"c6e828bad08fb5a9bb0f292fab750a058c1a0e3e8af884df01e4c0f56ae93bdc",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"200fcda180e939dce5d195cfa0a9430fe39b4973c518e787cb31629ecc35c564",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"0ce528cf7988ca16dbbf223f2c914abf7136b543f7564341a077e2de8b2e25c0",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/users/Hamm/statuses/111853822449810231",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1cm5z3wks3766nwc09yh6kag2qkxp5r373tugfhcpunq026hf80wqfvc0wz Judge Winsor writes “the secondary problem is that the laws’ effects are not limited to Disney. The laws are directed at a special development district in which Disney operates. But as Disney acknowledges, it is not the district’s only landowner, and other landowners within the district are affected by the same laws.”\n\nIs there a minimum number of entities affected by the laws in question required for retaliatory intent to be ignored?",
"sig": "4c4d9096b9f2cab5fe3057d8d997bff5029e0abb94f7cd72a41e98e4b9d06e9a672b7fd6210985b6e5f7299c450764e7804f0d100227932724d9bc751e6a4e31"
}
