Eric Lombrozo [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-07-23 📝 Original message:> On Jul 23, 2015, at 5:22 ...

📅 Original date posted:2015-07-23
📝 Original message:> On Jul 23, 2015, at 5:22 PM, Jean-Paul Kogelman <jeanpaulkogelman at me.com> wrote:
>
> You are not going to get a fair fee market if your only form of enforcement is the threat of exclusion.
>
> A more fair fee market will develop if miners start offering quality of service, preferably at multiple tiers. At that point any interference from a block size cap will only be detrimental. In fact it will only highlight what the cap is actually for; to prevent monster blocks.
>
> Add better QoS tools for miners and extend the cap (when possible) and there's your fee market.
>
> jp

Not sure what you mean by QoS here. Either your transaction is included or it isn’t. It’s not like you can upgrade to a master suite with a view or anything.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150723/2d67e8c5/attachment-0001.sig>;