📅 Original date posted:2015-08-29 📝 Original message:On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at ...

Chun Wang [ARCHIVE] /

npub1edz…qjxc

2023-06-07 17:38:28

in reply to nevent1q…x5jy

📅 Original date posted:2015-08-29
📝 Original message:On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 4:10 AM, Jorge Timón
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
/tx/3b95a766d7a99b87188d6875c8484cb2b310b78459b7816d4dfc3f0f7e04281a?chain=000000000933ea01ad0ee984209779baaec3ced90fa3f408719526f8d77f4943
>
> (a tx in testnet)
>
> /block/00000000000000000b0d504d142ac8bdd1a2721d19f423a8146d0d6de882167b?chain=000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f

Some altcoins (LTC and FTC for example) have the same genesis block hash.

On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 4:10 AM, Jorge Timón
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Matt Whitlock via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> That's still not right, since "mainnet" and "testnet" are not host names.
>>
>> You'd have to do something like:
>>
>> blockchain:?network=testnet&txid=3b95a766d7a99b87188d6875c8484cb2b310b78459b7816d4dfc3f0f7e04281a
>
> I would really prefer chain=<chainID> over network=<chainPetnameStr>
> By chainID I mean the hash of the genesis block, see
> https://github.com/jtimon/bitcoin/commit/3191d5e8e75687a27cf466b7a4c70bdc04809d39
> I'm completely fine with doing that using an optional parameter (for
> backwards compatibility).
>
> I agree with Andreas Schildbach that respecting the most commonly used
> schemes is desirable.
> So my preference would be:
>
> /tx/3b95a766d7a99b87188d6875c8484cb2b310b78459b7816d4dfc3f0f7e04281a?chain=000000000933ea01ad0ee984209779baaec3ced90fa3f408719526f8d77f4943
>
> (a tx in testnet)
>
> /block/00000000000000000b0d504d142ac8bdd1a2721d19f423a8146d0d6de882167b?chain=000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f
>
> (a block in bitcoin's mainnet)
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

Author Public Key

npub1edz8qyleqfqddckyjs0erkqysv2n76fwatw32nehpm5k7gertf4shmqjxc

Seen on

wss://relay.nostr.band

Show more details

Published at

2023-06-07 17:38:28

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "b5726bf35dca705a263bced1ae51b1b90595b2d26a421a62bc05d27e66954f4b", "pubkey": "cb447013f90240d6e2c4941f91d80483153f692eeadd154f370ee96f23235a6b", "created_at": 1686159508, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "e", "7cc8d14173d1f56e3744d772d4d70152d07a99a0b5f93142926f4b2f8204351e", "", "root" ], [ "e", "1152a0776deccb22eec3176ec1e95cc350035964280f7dac4b014463bf472447", "", "reply" ], [ "p", "498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84" ] ], "content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-29\n📝 Original message:On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 4:10 AM, Jorge Timón\n\u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n/tx/3b95a766d7a99b87188d6875c8484cb2b310b78459b7816d4dfc3f0f7e04281a?chain=000000000933ea01ad0ee984209779baaec3ced90fa3f408719526f8d77f4943\n\u003e\n\u003e (a tx in testnet)\n\u003e\n\u003e /block/00000000000000000b0d504d142ac8bdd1a2721d19f423a8146d0d6de882167b?chain=000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f\n\nSome altcoins (LTC and FTC for example) have the same genesis block hash.\n\nOn Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 4:10 AM, Jorge Timón\n\u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Matt Whitlock via bitcoin-dev\n\u003e \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e That's still not right, since \"mainnet\" and \"testnet\" are not host names.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e You'd have to do something like:\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e blockchain:?network=testnet\u0026txid=3b95a766d7a99b87188d6875c8484cb2b310b78459b7816d4dfc3f0f7e04281a\n\u003e\n\u003e I would really prefer chain=\u003cchainID\u003e over network=\u003cchainPetnameStr\u003e\n\u003e By chainID I mean the hash of the genesis block, see\n\u003e https://github.com/jtimon/bitcoin/commit/3191d5e8e75687a27cf466b7a4c70bdc04809d39\n\u003e I'm completely fine with doing that using an optional parameter (for\n\u003e backwards compatibility).\n\u003e\n\u003e I agree with Andreas Schildbach that respecting the most commonly used\n\u003e schemes is desirable.\n\u003e So my preference would be:\n\u003e\n\u003e /tx/3b95a766d7a99b87188d6875c8484cb2b310b78459b7816d4dfc3f0f7e04281a?chain=000000000933ea01ad0ee984209779baaec3ced90fa3f408719526f8d77f4943\n\u003e\n\u003e (a tx in testnet)\n\u003e\n\u003e /block/00000000000000000b0d504d142ac8bdd1a2721d19f423a8146d0d6de882167b?chain=000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f\n\u003e\n\u003e (a block in bitcoin's mainnet)\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev", "sig": "ab529c354480e83d6b6f7e6f30e068d0f266eb9c8d1e843173f71d132bf7af030dc5ad67280adebe01d069ef071390fc16ea001d92f6df24e7799d633f926e54" }