Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2017-02-14 📝 Original message:On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at ...

📅 Original date posted:2017-02-14
📝 Original message:On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 04:57:46PM +0100, Staf Verhaegen via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Chris Priest via bitcoin-dev schreef op vr 03-02-2017 om 16:57 [-0800]:
> > Personally I think once the blocksize arguments are solved, there will
> > be no more contentious changes for this voting system to deal with.
> > What other contentious issues have come up in the past 3 years or so
> > that wasn't blocksize/scaling related? Do other protocols like TCP/IP
> > and the HTTP protocol have developers arguing every day over issues no
> > one can agree on?
>
> Yes, DRM for example.

...and note how, like blocksize, the roots of the DRM argument at W3C aren't a
technical disagreement, but rather a political disagreement.

--
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170214/042791b2/attachment.sig>;