Filipe on Nostr: #[0] I just see AT as "protocol competition" with AP. My main concern is why it ...
npub1qg48cy9nkrm0pkeuz7e9zrzeq2n6lnlwyn30u9zd0xe07g9qvras00augv (npub1qg4…augv) I just see AT as "protocol competition" with AP. My main concern is why it didn't go through W3C. Optimists will say "to move faster", pessimists will say "they wanna monopolise". It's probably both.
Despite this, the spec itself seems to be good and solve some (all?) of AP's issues. I would love to see an expert, like npub1w7agf7akg5kqzjrc9ulhezf3c8n3v8q9vp6hkxatm6nfak6swzyqe9tpn3 (npub1w7a…tpn3) go in depth about AT's flaws, as a protocol. I'm sure it has some.
Despite this, the spec itself seems to be good and solve some (all?) of AP's issues. I would love to see an expert, like npub1w7agf7akg5kqzjrc9ulhezf3c8n3v8q9vp6hkxatm6nfak6swzyqe9tpn3 (npub1w7a…tpn3) go in depth about AT's flaws, as a protocol. I'm sure it has some.