npub1cy…5s33a on Nostr: npub1kpwlx…xxzz4 npub1ztt9m…dtvss That was in reference to the government aid to ...
npub1kpwlxpzkxfmuxjmzc2wp3rf9vjg0sgydmlhsnrgqr3maf59h86qqdxxzz4 (npub1kpw…xzz4) npub1ztt9mw26k5nju6jccrm6fhvpu3f8t3mxjkgu6q5p4x62e7zy9gmshdtvss (npub1ztt…tvss) That was in reference to the government aid to hospitals and nursing homes. During that time, there were some acquisitions by larger healthcare providers.
The death toll from COVID-19 is likely somewhere around 1 million in the US over the 4 years of circulating. It's not all due to the virus, the government dropped the ball so many times. If you want to include suicides, overdoses and homicides from people who lost work, faced years of discrimination from the jabbed hive mind and poor economic conditions. I would say that perhaps I agree with that but it doesn't give the proper attribution.
If there are problems with a dataset, the results will be inaccurate no matter how accurate models are because we would likely not know. If crafted false assumptions are assumed, anything can be proven. The level of integrity I'm looking for, which likely doesn't exist, is made worse by skewed data. I'm assuming that any and all sides are using damned lies and statistics to push an ideology.
Do I believe you are wrong? Not necessarily, but I believe more tampering occurred with the data. It's all about the data. According to what I suspect your criteria is, you are correct. According to my criteria, I'm humbled and still believe the data to be wrong.
The death toll from COVID-19 is likely somewhere around 1 million in the US over the 4 years of circulating. It's not all due to the virus, the government dropped the ball so many times. If you want to include suicides, overdoses and homicides from people who lost work, faced years of discrimination from the jabbed hive mind and poor economic conditions. I would say that perhaps I agree with that but it doesn't give the proper attribution.
If there are problems with a dataset, the results will be inaccurate no matter how accurate models are because we would likely not know. If crafted false assumptions are assumed, anything can be proven. The level of integrity I'm looking for, which likely doesn't exist, is made worse by skewed data. I'm assuming that any and all sides are using damned lies and statistics to push an ideology.
Do I believe you are wrong? Not necessarily, but I believe more tampering occurred with the data. It's all about the data. According to what I suspect your criteria is, you are correct. According to my criteria, I'm humbled and still believe the data to be wrong.