Casey Hewitt on Nostr: Rare TRO denial in the NDIL: Judge Tharp issued an order denying a TRO in a Schedule ...
Rare TRO denial in the NDIL: Judge Tharp issued an order denying a TRO in a Schedule A case because the Plaintiff failed to identify what products are alleged to have infringed on which specific copyright/design patent. Plaintiff is instructed to submit a new motion including a detailed claim chart for the Court to review. Hexin Holding v. Schedule A, No. 24 cv 1460 (NDIL Feb. 27, 2024)
Published at
2024-02-29 14:03:06Event JSON
{
"id": "324c718bb9529ab8e524439f74ac1cade5285af5eee5c51cc918d6bcf73e3b1b",
"pubkey": "b81aec0fc1bd6a95dfc56df7b42760004d3da570a949491723dce2b5dde5ab2c",
"created_at": 1709215386,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/users/hewittlaw/statuses/112015139539612750",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "Rare TRO denial in the NDIL: Judge Tharp issued an order denying a TRO in a Schedule A case because the Plaintiff failed to identify what products are alleged to have infringed on which specific copyright/design patent. Plaintiff is instructed to submit a new motion including a detailed claim chart for the Court to review. Hexin Holding v. Schedule A, No. 24 cv 1460 (NDIL Feb. 27, 2024)\n\nhttps://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/112/015/138/153/477/106/original/66baba085dc48cdb.png",
"sig": "b949a8a16ebdce551d1451bcde8b7d2fcf0fdf9ebe84e7d99bdfa80ee4189bef86cb3f299addd29a96dadacbd57dd42267eb2f14fbe4006534915a915f38b30e"
}
