Adam Back [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-10-07 📝 Original message:Thank you for posting ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-10-07
📝 Original message:Thank you for posting that, most informative, and suggest people
arguing here lately to read it carefully.
May I suggest that people who wish to debate what rough consensus
means, to take it to this reddit thread
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3ntga9/bitcoindev_a_brilliant_post_on_defining_consensus/
Thanks again for posting, helpful context/reminder for all.
Adam
On 7 October 2015 at 07:07, Ryan Grant via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Bitcoin's participants can improve their ability to stay on a valuable
> and censorship resistant blockchain by individually and informally
> absorbing cultural wisdom regarding "rough consensus". This does not
> require writing any formal rules about what rough consensus is. It is
> a matter of participation with an understanding.
>
> https://www.ietf.org/tao.html#rfc.section.2
...
📝 Original message:Thank you for posting that, most informative, and suggest people
arguing here lately to read it carefully.
May I suggest that people who wish to debate what rough consensus
means, to take it to this reddit thread
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3ntga9/bitcoindev_a_brilliant_post_on_defining_consensus/
Thanks again for posting, helpful context/reminder for all.
Adam
On 7 October 2015 at 07:07, Ryan Grant via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Bitcoin's participants can improve their ability to stay on a valuable
> and censorship resistant blockchain by individually and informally
> absorbing cultural wisdom regarding "rough consensus". This does not
> require writing any formal rules about what rough consensus is. It is
> a matter of participation with an understanding.
>
> https://www.ietf.org/tao.html#rfc.section.2
...