Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-09-03 📝 Original message:On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-09-03
📝 Original message:On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 06:32:09PM +0100, Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Just use a 4-byte unsigned integer where the integer is the size in
> bytes. It's concise and less complex (and less complex to implement).
> There's no need for human readable strings here.
Solid NACK on making string parsers part of the consensus critical
codebase. (WTF‽)
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000000c69430beea18c71be1d34114d7e1d4023dd1ffe1d9bc7f0
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 650 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150903/9c4c10ba/attachment.sig>
📝 Original message:On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 06:32:09PM +0100, Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Just use a 4-byte unsigned integer where the integer is the size in
> bytes. It's concise and less complex (and less complex to implement).
> There's no need for human readable strings here.
Solid NACK on making string parsers part of the consensus critical
codebase. (WTF‽)
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000000c69430beea18c71be1d34114d7e1d4023dd1ffe1d9bc7f0
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 650 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150903/9c4c10ba/attachment.sig>