📅 Original date posted:2015-12-29 📝 Original message:What if someone complains? ...

jl2012 [ARCHIVE] /

npub14vw…yksm

2023-06-07 17:47:22

in reply to nevent1q…tyuu

📅 Original date posted:2015-12-29
📝 Original message:What if someone complains? We can't even tell whether a complaint is
legit or just trolling. That's why I think we need some general
consensus rules which is not written in code, but as a social contract.
Breaking those rules would be considered as a hardfork and is allowed
only in exceptional situation.

Jonathan Toomim via bitcoin-dev 於 2015-12-29 07:42 寫到:
> That sounds like a rather unlikely scenario. Unless you have a
> specific reason to suspect that might be the case, I think we don't
> need to worry about it too much. If we announce the intention to
> perform such a soft fork a couple of months before the soft fork
> becomes active, and if nobody complains about it destroying their
> secret stash, then I think that's fair enough and we could proceed.
>
> On Dec 28, 2015, at 11:47 PM, jl2012 via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> Do we need to consider that someone may have a timelocked big tx, with
>> private key lost?
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

Author Public Key

npub14vwgt02663pkxx54kg5t693shaavmvnldhsp49sve7asw7p36lkqljyksm

Show more details

Published at

2023-06-07 17:47:22

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "3740efa9f78effc2f29a4d0a8ec4db46bd88f06a5082d62cac58aa98925232e4", "pubkey": "ab1c85bd5ad443631a95b228bd1630bf7acdb27f6de01a960ccfbb077831d7ec", "created_at": 1686160042, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "e", "0600edb122b23d28de1adba7ca47e2347d6be937da11235e57408ba908190104", "", "root" ], [ "e", "6b32000177baa4b9d161b16c88341844500e4c0d7373fa2ffdca86cd54883438", "", "reply" ], [ "p", "0ff56c09ef879c89ea04bfa2d5f5e0d96000ed6eaf5ac38e7b538a9d92767569" ] ], "content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-12-29\n📝 Original message:What if someone complains? We can't even tell whether a complaint is \nlegit or just trolling. That's why I think we need some general \nconsensus rules which is not written in code, but as a social contract. \nBreaking those rules would be considered as a hardfork and is allowed \nonly in exceptional situation.\n\nJonathan Toomim via bitcoin-dev 於 2015-12-29 07:42 寫到:\n\u003e That sounds like a rather unlikely scenario. Unless you have a\n\u003e specific reason to suspect that might be the case, I think we don't\n\u003e need to worry about it too much. If we announce the intention to\n\u003e perform such a soft fork a couple of months before the soft fork\n\u003e becomes active, and if nobody complains about it destroying their\n\u003e secret stash, then I think that's fair enough and we could proceed.\n\u003e \n\u003e On Dec 28, 2015, at 11:47 PM, jl2012 via bitcoin-dev\n\u003e \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \n\u003e\u003e Do we need to consider that someone may have a timelocked big tx, with \n\u003e\u003e private key lost?\n\u003e \n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev", "sig": "a077c4c2e91818a1336166834a58827c9ac11b11a62a4bef187bb1c9c466079d0bd1717aac1eccdb4b3cae50ddb0bd0a44ec07eca29083dd60b47cb380e3f2b2" }