slush [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2014-04-08 š Original message:On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at ...
š
Original date posted:2014-04-08
š Original message:On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Andreas Schildbach <andreas at schildbach.de>wrote:
> On 04/08/2014 05:46 PM, slush wrote:
>
> > It still doesn't mean that bitcoinj or Electrum cannot share the bare
> > minimum of BIP XX. Of course if somebody will use Electrum for 2to3
> > transactions and then move wallet to client which does not offer such
> > feature, it won't work. But I don't see that as a problem.
>
> There is no "bare minimum". Either you implement the "BIP" fully or not.
>
I didn't mean "Bare minimum of some spec", but "spec describing bare
minimum", which is different. I'm sorry for confusion.
Marek
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140408/792dd287/attachment.html>;
š Original message:On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Andreas Schildbach <andreas at schildbach.de>wrote:
> On 04/08/2014 05:46 PM, slush wrote:
>
> > It still doesn't mean that bitcoinj or Electrum cannot share the bare
> > minimum of BIP XX. Of course if somebody will use Electrum for 2to3
> > transactions and then move wallet to client which does not offer such
> > feature, it won't work. But I don't see that as a problem.
>
> There is no "bare minimum". Either you implement the "BIP" fully or not.
>
I didn't mean "Bare minimum of some spec", but "spec describing bare
minimum", which is different. I'm sorry for confusion.
Marek
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140408/792dd287/attachment.html>;