Yo Soy Freeman on Nostr: npub1nqp93…mw9sy I would say that most Linux users understand that a kernel level ...
npub1nqp93y3l9r4cse4mpqlhuq3mjtctlujgyh8ksx8x57wvzt030epq3mw9sy (npub1nqp…w9sy)
I would say that most Linux users understand that a kernel level anti cheat is malware by definition and doesn't even work as is supposed to. Cheaters still cheat.
I truly think you have good intentions, so this is my honest question:
It has been proved that the best, and probably only way to stop cheating is human monitoring and intervention.
Why should a whole OS be made less secure in order to facilitate the use of an intrusive software when the issue is not even on the user side?
I would say that most Linux users understand that a kernel level anti cheat is malware by definition and doesn't even work as is supposed to. Cheaters still cheat.
I truly think you have good intentions, so this is my honest question:
It has been proved that the best, and probably only way to stop cheating is human monitoring and intervention.
Why should a whole OS be made less secure in order to facilitate the use of an intrusive software when the issue is not even on the user side?