Event JSON
{
"id": "3e376d581884a9a13ce2cb173c3f55f587682fc54e72c22b41e82471e097a02c",
"pubkey": "e15ca9947e8a7c90f4e8f40a2d6b5d8373eeca022e87d844e26c78c251e2cd83",
"created_at": 1727334959,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"0bf4e456b6f98e01d2cf592bc430a4f7b4d348af2e1cd888ecedea9204e244c0",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"99fadb3fd789f641da829cc1eb9862eb2782d672a77eee207f0fb5b45559ba7f",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"t",
"openscience"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://bayes.club/users/modrak_m/statuses/113202623895787244",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "The retracted Protzko et al. (High replicability when using \"rigor enhancing practices\") paper saga gets worse. Instead of coming clean nostr:npub1p06wg44klx8qr5k0ty4ugv9y776dxj909cwd3z8vah4fyp8zgnqqpxmvty and other co-authors try to frame it as a minor procedural issue. It was not, just read the retraction notice. Sadly, open-science proponents cannot get even the basics of open science right. Kill your heroes, I guess.\n\nhttps://joebakcoleman.com/blog/2024/protzko/\n\n#OpenScience\n\nhttps://cdn.masto.host/bayesclub/media_attachments/files/113/202/623/728/513/220/original/cffb0c1086a86a63.png\n\nhttps://cdn.masto.host/bayesclub/media_attachments/files/113/202/623/742/695/334/original/f39d8f1ec7727229.png",
"sig": "3fd020f0e876f1a6e70c7fd8b90fab18431a042c593db488409d018ae3a5e8ac5f310b69924537f5b3b9d7e7a01439df094a922dbc973502653ab890237d5322"
}