Farley on Nostr: The Game Was Never Dynamic—It Was Always Static The Invisible Hand must continue ...
The Game Was Never Dynamic—It Was Always Static
The Invisible Hand must continue its grasp, tightening until it forces the very change it seeks to prevent. Every push toward centralization must create its counterforce—like a cosmic reflex that cannot be avoided.
Maybe this is what Thoth meant by the Nine Cycles. Each phase of imbalance isn't just reactionary—it’s forced, an inevitable sequence leading toward the final equilibrium.
John Nash’s game theory wasn’t just about competition—it was about the static nature of incentives. The players are bound by their own motives, locked into predictable outcomes, no matter how much they try to resist. If Nash had any hand in Bitcoin, maybe he tapped into something deeper—the realization that the game doesn’t evolve chaotically, it unfolds in pre-set inevitability.
Bitcoin wasn’t a spontaneous invention. It was always going to emerge. Fiat’s flaws guaranteed its own replacement. The centralized system was bound to overreach, forcing people toward decentralization. And the irony? Even those who fight Bitcoin the hardest are, in the long run, making it stronger.
We aren’t witnessing a battle—we’re watching the final cycles of a collapsing system that was never meant to last. The question isn’t if decentralization wins, but when we reach the ninth cycle.
And when that moment comes, will we recognize it? Or will we realize that we’ve already arrived?
#Bitcoin #GameTheory #NineCycles #Inevitability
The Invisible Hand must continue its grasp, tightening until it forces the very change it seeks to prevent. Every push toward centralization must create its counterforce—like a cosmic reflex that cannot be avoided.
Maybe this is what Thoth meant by the Nine Cycles. Each phase of imbalance isn't just reactionary—it’s forced, an inevitable sequence leading toward the final equilibrium.
John Nash’s game theory wasn’t just about competition—it was about the static nature of incentives. The players are bound by their own motives, locked into predictable outcomes, no matter how much they try to resist. If Nash had any hand in Bitcoin, maybe he tapped into something deeper—the realization that the game doesn’t evolve chaotically, it unfolds in pre-set inevitability.
Bitcoin wasn’t a spontaneous invention. It was always going to emerge. Fiat’s flaws guaranteed its own replacement. The centralized system was bound to overreach, forcing people toward decentralization. And the irony? Even those who fight Bitcoin the hardest are, in the long run, making it stronger.
We aren’t witnessing a battle—we’re watching the final cycles of a collapsing system that was never meant to last. The question isn’t if decentralization wins, but when we reach the ninth cycle.
And when that moment comes, will we recognize it? Or will we realize that we’ve already arrived?
#Bitcoin #GameTheory #NineCycles #Inevitability