Andrew Poelstra [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2018-01-23 š Original message:On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at ...
š
Original date posted:2018-01-23
š Original message:On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:45:06PM +0000, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:22 PM, Anthony Towns <aj at erisian.com.au> wrote:
> > Hmm, at least people can choose not to reuse addresses currently --
> > if everyone were using taproot and that didn't involve hashing the key,
>
> Can you show me a model of quantum computation that is conjectured to
> be able to solve the discrete log problem but which would take longer
> than fractions of a second to do so? Quantum computation has to occur
> within the coherence lifetime of the system.
>
> > way for individuals to hedge against quantum attacks in case they're ever feasible, at least that I can see (well, without moving their funds out of bitcoin anyway)?
>
> By using scriptpubkeys with actual security against quantum computers
> instead of snake-oil.
>
> > (It seems like using the point at infinity wouldn't work because
>
> Indeed, that doesn't work.
>
> > that when quantum attacks start approaching feasibility. If funds are
> > being held in reused addresses over the long term, that would be more
>
> They are. But I don't believe that is relevant; the attacker would
> simply steal the coins on spend.
Then the system would need to be hardforked to allow spending through a
quantum-resistant ZKP of knowledge of the hashed public key. I expect
that in a post-quantum world there will be demand for such a fork,
especially if we came into such a world through surprise evidence of
a discrete log break.
--
Andrew Poelstra
Mathematics Department, Blockstream
Email: apoelstra at wpsoftware.net
Web: https://www.wpsoftware.net/andrew
"A goose alone, I suppose, can know the loneliness of geese
who can never find their peace,
whether north or south or west or east"
--Joanna Newsom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180124/73e08261/attachment.sig>
š Original message:On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:45:06PM +0000, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:22 PM, Anthony Towns <aj at erisian.com.au> wrote:
> > Hmm, at least people can choose not to reuse addresses currently --
> > if everyone were using taproot and that didn't involve hashing the key,
>
> Can you show me a model of quantum computation that is conjectured to
> be able to solve the discrete log problem but which would take longer
> than fractions of a second to do so? Quantum computation has to occur
> within the coherence lifetime of the system.
>
> > way for individuals to hedge against quantum attacks in case they're ever feasible, at least that I can see (well, without moving their funds out of bitcoin anyway)?
>
> By using scriptpubkeys with actual security against quantum computers
> instead of snake-oil.
>
> > (It seems like using the point at infinity wouldn't work because
>
> Indeed, that doesn't work.
>
> > that when quantum attacks start approaching feasibility. If funds are
> > being held in reused addresses over the long term, that would be more
>
> They are. But I don't believe that is relevant; the attacker would
> simply steal the coins on spend.
Then the system would need to be hardforked to allow spending through a
quantum-resistant ZKP of knowledge of the hashed public key. I expect
that in a post-quantum world there will be demand for such a fork,
especially if we came into such a world through surprise evidence of
a discrete log break.
--
Andrew Poelstra
Mathematics Department, Blockstream
Email: apoelstra at wpsoftware.net
Web: https://www.wpsoftware.net/andrew
"A goose alone, I suppose, can know the loneliness of geese
who can never find their peace,
whether north or south or west or east"
--Joanna Newsom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180124/73e08261/attachment.sig>