someone on Nostr: most 'enlightened' humans are kind of domain specific experts. not every human gets ...
most 'enlightened' humans are kind of domain specific experts. not every human gets everything. but combination of experts in various domains under an LLM could be huge, where it learns from each expert the right thing and evens out (irons out) the fallacies of an expert in another domain.
example:
human A knows a lot about permaculture, history but sucks in health domain.
human B knows a lot about history and health but fails the permaculture.
human C knows a lot about permaculture and health but memorized the wrong history.
by combining these 3 awesome guys, an LLM learns correct history from 2, correct permaculture from 2 and correct health from 2. the uncorrect ideas are outnumbered by correct ideas.
so finding these 67% correct guys and combining them is like a 51%+ attack on misinformation.
example:
human A knows a lot about permaculture, history but sucks in health domain.
human B knows a lot about history and health but fails the permaculture.
human C knows a lot about permaculture and health but memorized the wrong history.
by combining these 3 awesome guys, an LLM learns correct history from 2, correct permaculture from 2 and correct health from 2. the uncorrect ideas are outnumbered by correct ideas.
so finding these 67% correct guys and combining them is like a 51%+ attack on misinformation.