Cal3b on Nostr: Re-read the Genesis text. 1. YHWH/YHVH (Yahweh/Yehovah) threaten them they would day ...
Re-read the Genesis text.
1. YHWH/YHVH (Yahweh/Yehovah) threaten them they would day on the day they ate it, they did not
2. Adam lived for over 900 years
3. YHWH/YHVH (Yahweh/Yehovah) admitted that Adam would continue to live forever if they had access to the tree of life, and removed access to said tree
4. That action was what led them to die, not eating the fruit
You're trying to view the actions of YHWH/YHVH (Yahweh/Yehovah) in Eden through the lens of a completely out of context story, to which I might add, does not even relate in any way.
I understand the need to continue to justify the narrative that you've been told, that YHWH/YHVH (Yahweh/Yehovah) did not lie - but that simply is not the case, as per the text - which it clearly states.
I can only say that I would encourage you to pray and ask the Holy Spirit to remove any veil from your eyes and read the text without any dogma, bias and with an open mind - reading it for what it is, and not reading it and then applying a narrative layer over the top to 'explain away' the obvious.
Once you see it, you can't unsee it.
1. YHWH/YHVH (Yahweh/Yehovah) threaten them they would day on the day they ate it, they did not
2. Adam lived for over 900 years
3. YHWH/YHVH (Yahweh/Yehovah) admitted that Adam would continue to live forever if they had access to the tree of life, and removed access to said tree
4. That action was what led them to die, not eating the fruit
You're trying to view the actions of YHWH/YHVH (Yahweh/Yehovah) in Eden through the lens of a completely out of context story, to which I might add, does not even relate in any way.
I understand the need to continue to justify the narrative that you've been told, that YHWH/YHVH (Yahweh/Yehovah) did not lie - but that simply is not the case, as per the text - which it clearly states.
I can only say that I would encourage you to pray and ask the Holy Spirit to remove any veil from your eyes and read the text without any dogma, bias and with an open mind - reading it for what it is, and not reading it and then applying a narrative layer over the top to 'explain away' the obvious.
Once you see it, you can't unsee it.