Jeff Garzik [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2015-10-01 š Original message:On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at ...
š
Original date posted:2015-10-01
š Original message:On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 5:41 AM, Marcel Jamin via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> I guess the question then becomes why bitcoin still is <1.0.0
>
I've said the same thing years ago. Originally the "1.0" was a target for
whenever "client mode" as planned by Satoshi was implemented, making the
Bitcoin Core implementation feature-complete for as a minimum
working/viable project.
Ultimately it is not so important and tends to generate a lot of discussion
- so maybe we should just do the emacs thing and go from 0.12 to 12.0 for
next version.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151001/acb987f9/attachment.html>;
š Original message:On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 5:41 AM, Marcel Jamin via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> I guess the question then becomes why bitcoin still is <1.0.0
>
I've said the same thing years ago. Originally the "1.0" was a target for
whenever "client mode" as planned by Satoshi was implemented, making the
Bitcoin Core implementation feature-complete for as a minimum
working/viable project.
Ultimately it is not so important and tends to generate a lot of discussion
- so maybe we should just do the emacs thing and go from 0.12 to 12.0 for
next version.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151001/acb987f9/attachment.html>;