Tom Harding [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-06-16 📝 Original message:On 6/16/2015 5:12 AM, ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-06-16
📝 Original message:On 6/16/2015 5:12 AM, Kalle Rosenbaum wrote:
> 2015-06-16 7:26 GMT+02:00 Tom Harding <tomh at thinlink.com>:
>> Kalle goes to some trouble to describe how merchants need to ensure that
>> they only accept a PoP provided as a response to their challenge.
>>
> Do you mean that it will be hard to explain to merchants that they
> must check the nonce in the PoP so that it matches the nonce in the
> pop request?
Sorry for the idiomatic language. No, I just meant that you have
thought it out in detail! You standardize a latent capability of the
cryptosystem. It seems very powerful for some classes of users.
📝 Original message:On 6/16/2015 5:12 AM, Kalle Rosenbaum wrote:
> 2015-06-16 7:26 GMT+02:00 Tom Harding <tomh at thinlink.com>:
>> Kalle goes to some trouble to describe how merchants need to ensure that
>> they only accept a PoP provided as a response to their challenge.
>>
> Do you mean that it will be hard to explain to merchants that they
> must check the nonce in the PoP so that it matches the nonce in the
> pop request?
Sorry for the idiomatic language. No, I just meant that you have
thought it out in detail! You standardize a latent capability of the
cryptosystem. It seems very powerful for some classes of users.