npub1unxqm…ez25q npub1g0zfm…ur7l8 npub1ccn4e…6czwu Theologically they can't ...

npub1vlc…uhm4

2024-01-30 14:57:08

in reply to nevent1q…qcu7

npub1unxqmqwynj0772ln4qznhqfg4y2wx0cg8y8zcpsmzgaa2hy8q02sgez25q (npub1unx…z25q) npub1g0zfm6lr403zmafqn98jma22v8pkg3x6d3jddwrda7p93ls85kms5ur7l8 (npub1g0z…r7l8) npub1ccn4ec2s2dmhzu4cthwhy56hcsswk4z3j3kvhlhuvp96phm9zjrqj6czwu (npub1ccn…czwu) Theologically they can't have divorce, God hates it, and if two Catholics are married in the church then divorce, they are no longer in good standing, can't take communion( a usually stop tithing or even showing up). The work around is to say it never happened, there was some, until now unrealized, defect in the marriage. But then if it never was a marriage you are going to wind up with lots of illegitimate children (which means less today than it used to, but still has effects) and no one wanted that. So, they proceeded to wrap themselves in the most convoluted rhetorical backflips to come to the desired conclusion... Marriage never happened, parents still tithing members of church, and children somehow legitimate. It really looks like they looked at their theological constraints, chose the desired end state, then reasoned they're way backwards to make it so.

Author Public Key

npub1vlcnyma7ulcdswy08tc29her8krq7w7wyw3kzsux9nrdyzemyr0qk9uhm4

Show more details

Published at

2024-01-30 14:57:08

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "3923ca54229c136d1a95125083364cc4483e6b1c72a70865e144c642678dc9d0", "pubkey": "67f1326fbee7f0d8388f3af0a2df233d860f3bce23a36143862cc6d20b3b20de", "created_at": 1706626628, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "p", "e4cc0d81c49c9fef2bf3a8053b8128a914e33f08390e2c061b123bd55c8703d5", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "p", "43c49debe3abe22df520994f2df54a61c36444da6c64d6b86def8258fe07a5b7", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "p", "c6275ce15053777172b85ddd725357c420eb5451946ccbfefc604ba0df651486", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "p", "a4d2e25d935515d37807002aaec03547e8b9c22ae1bdb5d0979833ca5f58113d", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "p", "16f4f768da019d8a7a1cb96a78dbec77299ee20855de581f50309cbdd7fd7c2a", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "p", "a9b11505c4614118ca65c7438d5f7772b1f23d6d411ed15a1b2683ab2cbbbbca", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "e", "658136033ca82173e2dbf3c8548d1e795281f8f50150fad6225e9afd374d0dda", "wss://relay.mostr.pub", "reply" ], [ "proxy", "https://infosec.exchange/users/Lightfighter/statuses/111845482708368313", "activitypub" ] ], "content": "nostr:npub1unxqmqwynj0772ln4qznhqfg4y2wx0cg8y8zcpsmzgaa2hy8q02sgez25q nostr:npub1g0zfm6lr403zmafqn98jma22v8pkg3x6d3jddwrda7p93ls85kms5ur7l8 nostr:npub1ccn4ec2s2dmhzu4cthwhy56hcsswk4z3j3kvhlhuvp96phm9zjrqj6czwu Theologically they can't have divorce, God hates it, and if two Catholics are married in the church then divorce, they are no longer in good standing, can't take communion( a usually stop tithing or even showing up). The work around is to say it never happened, there was some, until now unrealized, defect in the marriage. But then if it never was a marriage you are going to wind up with lots of illegitimate children (which means less today than it used to, but still has effects) and no one wanted that. So, they proceeded to wrap themselves in the most convoluted rhetorical backflips to come to the desired conclusion... Marriage never happened, parents still tithing members of church, and children somehow legitimate. It really looks like they looked at their theological constraints, chose the desired end state, then reasoned they're way backwards to make it so.", "sig": "d3d32bdb6ab8ddbfa35e16913fe5618be0962c448abccecbaafe046176d74534befeb07035fe2e62efcfe1576dce564c4597d743fa96283f72659c36353b24ce" }